Fiduciary Duty Litigation Attorneys Serving Clients Nationwide
A fiduciary relationship is built on a single premise: that someone entrusted with your money, your business, or your family’s future will act in your interest rather than their own. When that trust is broken, the loss is rarely just financial. Kaufman & Hilbert PC represents beneficiaries, business owners, shareholders, and institutions in disputes over breached fiduciary duties, and defends fiduciaries facing claims that their judgment or conduct fell short. Based in Alpharetta, Georgia, and serving clients nationwide and internationally, the firm brings senior litigators to matters that turn on documents, motives, and the fine details of what a fiduciary knew and when. These cases are won on the record, and we build that record from the first day.
How Kaufman & Hilbert Can Help
Fiduciary claims arise in trusts, partnerships, closely held companies, estates, and professional relationships. Our attorneys handle them from both sides, including:
- Claims against trustees, executors, and administrators for mismanagement, self-dealing, or disregarded instructions
- Partner, shareholder, member, officer, and director breach of duty claims
- Breach of loyalty, usurpation of corporate opportunity, and self-interested transaction disputes
- Accountings, surcharge actions, and removal of a fiduciary
- Defense of trustees, executors, directors, and officers against breach of duty allegations
Our Fiduciary Duty Litigation Services
Trustee and Estate Fiduciary Claims
Professional and individual trustees owe duties of loyalty, prudence, impartiality, and obedience to the terms of the trust. We litigate claims that a trustee invested imprudently, ignored the settlor’s directions, favored one class of beneficiary over another, charged improper fees, or failed to account. We pursue surcharge, removal, and recovery of losses, and we defend fiduciaries whose good-faith judgment is being second-guessed with the benefit of hindsight.
Partnership, Shareholder, and Director Disputes
Partners, LLC members, majority shareholders, officers, and directors owe duties to the entity and, in many circumstances, to each other. We handle freeze-outs, diverted opportunities, undisclosed related-party transactions, misuse of company assets, and breaches tied to buy-sell and operating agreements. Because the firm also advises companies on governance and transactions, we read these disputes the way the underlying documents were meant to be read.
Defense of Fiduciaries
A breach of fiduciary duty allegation puts a professional reputation on the line alongside the money. We defend trustees, executors, banks, advisors, officers, and directors, focusing early on the scope of the duty actually owed, the business judgment and good-faith defenses available, exculpatory and indemnification provisions, and the limitations and laches issues that dispose of stale claims.
CASE CALLOUT MODULE
Representative Result: Namik v. Wachovia Bank of Georgia (Georgia Supreme Court, 2005)
As lead counsel, Robert J. Kaufman secured a Georgia Supreme Court victory for the Namik family, reinstating the trial court’s finding that Wachovia breached its fiduciary and contractual duties as trustee by disregarding the settlor’s investment instructions. The decision reinforced that professional trustees must exercise informed prudence and honor a client’s specific directions when managing trust assets.
Namik v. Wachovia Bank of Georgia, 279 Ga. 250, 612 S.E.2d 270 (2005)
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every matter is decided on its own facts.
Who We Serve
We represent trust and estate beneficiaries, settlors and their families, business owners and investors on the wrong side of a controlling partner, and companies whose officers or advisors put themselves first. We also defend the fiduciaries in those relationships: corporate trustees, executors and administrators, directors, officers, and professional advisors. Most of these clients arrive after months of unanswered questions or a single document that finally made the picture clear. What they need is a candid read on what the duty required, what the evidence will show, and what recovery is realistically worth.